Sat, 15 Aug 2020

Coalition's climate win claim doesn't add up

Independent Australia
07 Jul 2020, 16:52 GMT+10

Australia could struggle to meet emission reduction targets despite Angus Taylor's claim of Kyoto success, writes Michael Mazengarb.

THE MORRISON GOVERNMENT has claimed success in meeting Australia's targets under the Kyoto Protocol - which came to an end on 30 June 2020 - despite three decades of relative inaction and stalling from successive federal governments.

The truth is - despite protestations from Energy and Emissions Reduction Minister Angus Taylor - the dial has barely moved on Australia's emissions over the last 20 years or even the last 30 years. It now faces a huge challenge to meet its modest targets for the Paris Agreement, which effectively comes into force from 1 July 2020.

In a recent media release, Minister Taylor stated:

The Morrison Government now estimates that Australia "beat" its Kyoto Protocol targets by 430 million tonnes of emissions. But the graph below tells a different story to that of the Government's accounting acrobatics.

Australia had two targets under the Kyoto Protocol. The first allowed Australia to increase its emissions by 8% based on 1990 levels, by 2012. The second target required Australia to cut its emissions by just 0.5% by 2020, also based on 1990 levels.

Combined with very convenient rules that have allowed Australia to claim emissions reductions credits after it wound back substantial levels of land clearing in the early 1990s, Australia has effectively been able to grow its emissions while claiming that it was 'meeting and beating' its emission reduction targets.

Source: Department of Environment and Energy

In fact, if it were not for a significant amount of credit that Australia has claimed through a reduction in land-use emissions achieved in the early 1990s, Australia's emissions would have increased by more than 30%.

Australia's fossil fuel use has continued to grow and the fundamental transformation needed to ensure Australia remains competitive in a low-emissions global economy has not taken place.

While the growth of renewable energy uptake has helped to substantially drive down emissions in the electricity sector over the last ten years, electricity emissions are still almost 40% higher than they were in 1990.

These improvements in Australia's emissions have been countered by strong support from successive governments for the expansion of Australia's fossil fuel industries.

Source: Department of Environment and Energy

Since 1990, due to a failure to put in place meaningful vehicle emissions standards, transport emissions have been allowed to increase by more than 63%. Several analysts have suggested Australia runs the risk of becoming a dumping ground for high emissions vehicles.

Additionally, with the expansion of the Australian gas industry, fugitive emissions have rapidly increased (by more than 50%) with most of this growth occurring since the election of the Abbott Government in 2013.

Only two sectors, other than the land-use sector, have seen sustained reductions in emissions since 1990: the waste sector - where burning methane for energy production is financially viable - and the agricultural sector, which has been slammed by years of drought. The latter is not something to celebrate.

It is not just the growth in Australia's own greenhouse gas emissions that are concerning - Australia has emerged as a world-leading supplier of fossil fuels to the rest of the world. Since 1990, Australia's coal production has almost tripled, as Australia's coal exports grew.

Source: Office of the Chief Economist

Australia's natural gas production has also tripled - in just ten years - as Australia battles with Qatar for the position of world's largest natural gas exporter.

It is in this context that other countries were shocked by the Morrison Government's ongoing attempts to carry over the "surplus emissions reductions" achieved under the Kyoto Protocol into the Paris Agreement.

At international climate change negotiations, Australia has been singled out by other countries for obstructing progress towards a stronger international framework for reducing emissions. Australia's refusal to give up its surplus Kyoto units saw the last round of talks held in Madrid run several days overtime, with countries ultimately failing to reach a compromise position.

Given the surplus units have largely been generated through convenient accounting rules and very soft emission reduction targets, it is understandable why most of the rest of the world would not want these extract credits further undermining the strength of the Paris Agreement.

The Morrison Government also left leaders of Pacific region neighbours in literal tears, after working to water-down climate change commitments that emerged from the Pacific Island Leaders Forum held last year.

The lack of a meaningful long-term target has been repeatedly criticised by those that understand that there is an evitability around the shift to lower emissions energy sources.

Every Australian state and territory has adopted a net-zero emissions target, consistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement. Even the Australian Energy Council - which represents some of the largest incumbents in the Australian energy sector - has now endorsed a net-zero emissions target by 2050.

As aptly described by Mike Cannon-Brookes earlier this week, without a commitment to the zero-emissions goal, whatever policies the Federal Government puts in place will merely be a strategy without a destination and will not allow Australia to successfully seize the ample opportunities available to it in a low emissions global economy.

This article by Michael Mazengarb was originally published in RenewEconomy and has been republished with permission.

More Spain News

Access More

Sign up for Spain News

a daily newsletter full of things to discuss over drinks.and the great thing is that it's on the house!